McCain

You are currently browsing the archive for the McCain category.

I asked one of my female friends the other day who was bleeding Obama-mania and supporting Obama nation why she was doing that. Her response, “I’m very liberal at heart…”

My response to her was, “Liberal at heart and liberal in politics are two different things, because people who are truely liberal often disagree with the democrats for their historically ‘controlling’ & big government policies.”

Moral of it all: Just because it’s cool to be “very liberal” when your in the famous 20’s doesn’t mean its necessarily the right thing.

After all… what are all we bloggers going to do when Obama taxes the electric companies to bankruptcy and we have no more power? If wind, solar and other alternatives were available, we’d be already using them… trust me. Someone is just wanting to start a fortune 500 that pulls clean electricity out of the sky! The overhead costs would be significantly lower than a traditional power plant. If the technology was there, we’d be using it.

Despite the belief, I’m a firm believer if you are interested in voting for the lesser of the evil – it is John McCain. He seriously is quite different than Bush (despite what Obama’s ads say) and he would have a strong administration surrounding him. But I’ll have more on “the lesser of evil” in a post I hope to publish tomorrow, I just have to finish refining it.

Ofcourse we all know, I’m a bleeding Libertarian.  ”More Freedom, Less Government = Less Taxes

Tags: , , ,

Politics is just another phrase for bad girl drama… except it’s gender neutral and slightly celebrity-ish. It’s all about talking behind backs and being two faced, pointing the finger and claiming no responsibility, trying to stay off of CNN when you do something wrong and on when you think your right and ofcourse taking back handed deals.

My personal opinion to the solution of this economic crisis is very simple. If these companies need money, then they should go after everyone they gave multi million dollar bonus for doing such a good job of running the company into the ground and get those bonus back. Problem solved.

Now this is what kills me, see… these companies have been having problems for some time now and it’s been well known and documented. Yet, these financial companies kept giving out money and people kept reciveing as typical greedy politicians and executives do.

Looking at the list on public record:
Campaign Contributions

Okay. So those are all democratic party leaders. Note that the list is not party specific, the republicans start showing up at number five… McCain is not even on that list of the top 25.

Now there is Hilliarly Clinton… okay, okay… we can just assume she’s going to pull the, “I did not know” card – it’s a Clinton style and tradition. But Obama? Come on… I thought you were representing change!!? I’m starting to think that the only change you’re representing is that of your color. Because I want to believe you are full of change, I want to believe you are full of hope… but everywhere I look your just a same damn old greedy politician. The more I dig for information on you, the less hope I see. I’m sorry… I’d like to believe a candidate is all about change and hope, but how can I put my hope into someone knowingly takes campaign contributions from a failing company that is going to ask for tax payer money? It’s like having my tax dollars feed your party. Well I’m a Libertarian and I don’t want my money in your pocket.

If you, Mr. Obama, were all about change and hope… you’d be giving back your campaign contributions AND asking for all those people who had multi-million dollar bonus to hand back the money the received. That is the real bailout solution.

The other real solution is bankruptcy, not bailouts.
Here is an excerpt from an excellent article on CNN – one of the few they have:

“The current mess would never have occurred in the absence of ill-conceived federal policies. The federal government chartered Fannie Mae in 1938 and Freddie Mac in 1970; these two mortgage lending institutions are at the center of the crisis. The government implicitly promised these institutions that it would make good on their debts, so Fannie and Freddie took on huge amounts of excessive risk.

Worse, beginning in 1977 and even more in the 1990s and the early part of this century, Congress pushed mortgage lenders and Fannie/Freddie to expand subprime lending. The industry was happy to oblige, given the implicit promise of federal backing, and subprime lending soared.

This subprime lending was more than a minor relaxation of existing credit guidelines. This lending was a wholesale abandonment of reasonable lending practices in which borrowers with poor credit characteristics got mortgages they were ill-equipped to handle.”

Tags: , , , , , ,

I don’t understand why the Democrats are constantly blaming Bush for the mortgage crisis which is now affecting wall street. The problem with blaming Bush is he doesn’t control investors.

I HATE it when people blame Bush for problems he has no control over. What do you expect… him to think and control the investors like puppets? If he is thinking and controlling investors, how is it a free society then? And if you want him to control the investors, would that be American? He has no control over peoples greed on wall street… so why do the Democrats keep blaming him? I don’t know! I hate the blame game.

Here is a fantastic NPR story about the situation: audio clip from morning addition 19 September 2008.

From the feature, there are clearly other companies and investors that should be held responsible.

There are several things that I don’t agree with Bush about, but I don’t go around blaming him for things that are out of his control. I find this election season really annoying because the Democrats are blaming Bush for every known problem in the world and trying to relate it to John McCain. I believe there are some issues it’s fair to point the finger… but for the most part, alot of the finger pointing is unmerited. Sure, John McCain is not the saviour, but Obama Mania Barack is no where a lesser of the evil either.

I guess this is why I am neither Democrat or Republican, both parties worry more about blaming, finger pointing, gaining control and taking away liberty. My political views are summed up by the badge on the left.

Tags: , , ,

This country does not need an Obama-mania to change. This country does not need a decorated war veteran for change to happen. This country doesn’t even need an isolationist in power. This country needs to go back to it’s roots.

This country needs it’s citizen’s to stand up take some personal responsibility! We often worry to much about creating laws and passing restrictions rather than taking responsibility for our actions. It’s as if we’d rather point the finger and blame adamant objects before taking some responsibility.

You want the right to own a gun? Then take responsibility for it! Limiting guns and creating laws against them will not fix gun crimes. Stop trying to blame guns for the crimes… blame the criminals.

You want an educational system that works? Take action rather than blame.

You want the right to eat and chose your own health care? Then take responsibility for your health and start working out. Here is a great article that was in last week’s paper. Perhaps when manufacturing and labor jobs start etching their way back into our society, we will be come more fit as a nation.

This country was started because of people taking responsibility, I’d sure hate for that responsibility to go away.

Check out the article: It’s not the food, it’s the exercise (or lack thereof)

“The dietary difference between generations isn’t significant enough to explain the difference in weight. However, the change in activity is.”

Tags: ,

Looks like we are in Iraq for the long hall… despite what we are being told.

A secret deal being negotiated in Baghdad would perpetuate the American military occupation of Iraq indefinitely, regardless of the outcome of the US presidential election in November.

Source: The Independent

The last thing this country needs is permanent involvement in something other than itself.

Also… does this mean we were just spoon fed more typical lies during the primary season? Is Obama going to claim that he did not have such knowledge? What would Ron Paul do if he was the republican candidate? So Bush makes a deal, does the next president need to honor those deals? What is America’s best interest? What is McCain’s next move?

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

As I question why my home state wants another Clinton in the White House… (really, my whole life aside from the first 4 years has either been a Bush or a Clinton in the white house)… Do we really need to keep control of the country under the same 2 families? Do we really need someone that doesn’t know how to be a leader or take on the responsibility associated with leadership? Do we really need someone who lies and back-stabs at every waking moment? Do we really need someone who will in all likely keep Washington status-quo?

In the good news portion of the day, aside from a free shower at work, I stumbled upon a new youtube favorite. I feel as if this video has read my mind, everything said is incredibly true and often experienced/felt by DJs. I just love patrons/listeners who act like micromanagers.

As a slight follow up to yesterdays post…

This what a leader does. This is what a person in charge does.

“McCain approached reporters afterward to tell them he has “respect” for Obama and Clinton, and will treat them accordingly. He said he had no idea who brought Cunningham on stage, but “I take responsibility, and I apologize.”"

Notice how McCain did not pull a Clinton “I have no idea.”

Even though I am not to thrilled at the idea of McCain in the White House, I can at least have respect for the man.